Confronting the Judeocracy: The Six Stages of Enlightenment by Thomas Dalton Ph.D.

Anyone who has spent even a short time battling against the Judeocracy has surely experienced the frustration of attempting to persuade a trusted friend or colleague of the gravity of the situation—only to fail.  This is undoubtedly one of the most discouraging and troubling aspects of those who take up the mission for truth and justice.  We repeatedly encounter intelligent and well-read individuals who, we believe, surely must share our sense of concern and outrage.  If they do not, it can only be from lack of knowledge; therefore, a short chat or a targeted reading or two, we think, will do the trick.  The facts are indisputable, and hence it is merely a matter of information.  Once our friends have the requisite facts, they will surely—surely—see things our way.  And yet, time after time, they do not.

Why is this?  What are they thinking?  What is their logic?  How is it that they can fail to be fully convinced of the severity of the Jewish Question?  Or even just be sympathetic to our stance?  Why is it that they occasionally even become outright hostile—not to them, but to us?  How can they be in denial of what is, from a rational and objective standpoint, surely one of the major problems facing civilized humanity?  Undoubtedly this could be the topic of a book-length treatment, and I can only outline a few basic ideas here.  But I think there is some merit in examining the basic categories of response and denial by those confronted, perhaps for the first time in a serious manner, with the Jewish Question and with the many problems of living under de facto Jewish rule.

At its most basic level, the situation is one in which the relative novice is confronted with a difficult, troubling, and potentially catastrophic scenario: profound social corruption by wealthy and powerful Jews.  (I stress the ‘relative’ here; everyone, even the functionally illiterate, has heard something negative about the Jews, likely many negative things.)  It is a ‘bad news’ story of the highest magnitude.  And the last thing many people want in their lives these days is another bad news story.  God knows we’ve had enough troubles in recent years:  political upheaval, riots in the streets, a global pandemic, economic gyrations, unrestrained immigration, environmental decline, opioid crises, surging crime, falling lifespans.  Who needs yet one more disaster heaped upon their plates?  The Jews?  Really?  Are you serious?  And I suppose the Holocaust never happened!  (Hint:  it didn’t—not in the way described.)  What are you, some kind of Nazi?  A White supremacist?  On and on.

Despite all this, many of us persevere.  We realize that public education is one of our primary weapons in the Great Struggle, and we are bound and determined to press ahead and inform as many as possible of the nature of the problem.  Therefore, it is of some use to understand more precisely how people typically respond to our overtures, in order to be more effective in our communication.  After all, we are pursuing a noble cause, and we sincerely want people to be well-informed and, ideally, to join us in our mission.  Apart from our opponents, we genuinely want people to like and appreciate us.  You don’t get very far coming off like a fanatic or a jerk.  I’m quite confident that virtually none of us relish making enemies for the sake of making enemies.  We have no driving urge to be antagonistic or rabble-rousing.  Generally speaking, what we have are facts, experiences, and informed opinions on the Jews; these, combined with a general sense of concern for social welfare, justice, and the state of the world, incline us to undertake unusual, unpopular, but highly valuable actions to educate others, and to articulate possible solutions.  It is the prototypical ‘thankless task,’ and yet we do it all the same.

That said, it is helpful to have a model of how people react to the Jewish Question.  The approach I will outline here derives from another famous model describing how people react to a different crisis situation: death.  In the 1950s and 60s, Swiss (later, American) psychiatrist Elisabeth Kübler-Ross developed a well-known scheme that came to be known as “the five stages of grief.”  When confronted with imminent death, she said, people typically progress through five relatively distinct mental phases:  denial, anger, bargaining, depression, and acceptance.  Denial:  “No, this isn’t true, it can’t be happening.  There must be some mistake.”  Anger:  “How could this happen to me?  It’s just not fair!  Someone is to blame.  God, how could you let this happen!”  Bargaining:  “Please, God, get me through this and I promise to do x, y, z.  Or, doc, you have to help me; I’ll do whatever it takes.”  Depression:  “There’s no use, nothing will work.  I’m doomed.  What’s the use of even trying?”  And finally, Acceptance:  “Everyone dies, and I guess my time is up.  So be it.  Time to meet my Maker.”  This schema was first described in her initial book, On Death and Dying (1969).

I’ll not debate the merits or demerits of Kübler-Ross’ theory here.  Some have found it helpful, and others dismiss it as largely irrelevant or at least unsubstantiated.  Still, based only on common sense, I think we can see that there is some insight here, and that many people—perhaps some we have known personally—indeed experience such stages in varying degrees.  Obviously not everyone passes through all five stages, and not necessarily in the prescribed order, but nonetheless, these stages do describe some essential aspects of human response to the looming tragedy of one’s own demise.

Inspired by this model, let me then propose something analogous:  The Six Stages of Enlightenment on the Jewish Question.  I claim no real scientific grounding here, and I have done no exhaustive surveys or interviews.  This is based simply on my own personal experience, over several years, of confronting people—students, family, friends, strangers—on the dangers of the Judeocracy.  My six stages are as follows:

1. Denial
2. Irrelevance
3.  Impotence
4.  Misplaced Anger
5.  Acceptance
6.  Righteous Anger and Action

As with Kübler-Ross’s theory, I do not claim that all people experience all of these stages, nor that they necessarily progress through them in order.  But I do think that many people, when confronted with the data, do experience some or most of these stages.  Let me briefly describe each in turn, and then outline some of the relevant facts that make the case for enlightenment.

DENIAL.  Upon first hearing a serious claim that Jews have outsized and detrimental influence in society, or dominate the ranks of the wealthy, or run the media, or control politics, the usual initial response is denial:  “No they don’t.  That’s ridiculous.  There are no more Jews in power than anyone else.  That’s just an anti-Semitic canard.”  This, even from highly-educated people.  Fortunately, this is an empirical question; an overwhelming Jewish presence can be easily proven, given the relevant data.  Below I offer a concise version of this argument.

IRRELEVANCE.  Once it is shown that Jews are massively over-represented in key sectors of society, the standard reply is that this fact does not matter.  “Ok, there are lots of Jews in media, finance, and politics, but this doesn’t really matter.  People are just people.  There are good ones and there are bad ones.  If Jews hold lots of influential positions, that only means that they worked hard and succeeded.  And anyway, they’re just doing their jobs.  If they didn’t do them, someone else would.”

This seems like a common-sense view, but to make such a claim is to hold an extremely naïve and ill-informed view of the world.  It’s true that most decent people, and especially most Whites, tend to view others as individuals; there are likely evolutionary reasons for this, which I won’t elaborate here, but see Kevin MacDonald’s book Individualism and the Western Liberal Tradition for a good recent account.  If we judge everyone as basically well-intentioned individuals, then of course, it doesn’t really matter if Jews or any other minority dominates society.  If Jews are disproportionate, then it can only mean that they are that much smarter or industrious than others, and thus they deserve their standing. (Nathan Cofnas is doing his best to make this thesis academically respectable—refuted in several places, most recently by Andrew Joyce).  And if some Jews commit crimes or other unethical actions, we have to judge and punish them individually, on a case-by-case basis.  Or so they say.

The Jewish critic must then respond to this stance with a demonstration that it does matter, that Jewish over-representation has a long-standing and deep-rooted grounding in anti-White and even anti-human actions, and that it is remarkably detrimental to social and human well-being.  This is a longer and more difficult argument to make, but it can be done; again, I outline this case below.

IMPOTENCE.  Once we have shown the deleterious effect of Jewish dominance, the next reply is typically something like this:  “Ok, if Jews have so much power and influence, then you can’t possibly win.  They are just too strong.  So why fight them?  It can only hurt yourself and your family.  Better to just ignore the whole situation and live your life as best you can.”

Certainly this is a pragmatic view, and many otherwise well-intentioned critics adopt this line.  But ultimately it means surrender:  a moral capitulation to a malevolent ruling power.  To yield to evil is itself a great evil.  It is to condemn one’s own future, and that of your children and grandchildren, to a life of increasing brutality and coarseness, of deprivation and suffering, of conflict and war.  No truly concerned person can accept this.  We must confront the situation head-on.  To fight against evil, even in the face of likely defeat, is noble; it actually makes life worth living.  Even if victory is a long way off—and ultimate victory for our side is inevitable, once we understand the history—it is still a fight worth pursuing.  Living in a Judeocracy means that every major aspect of society is affected.  If you have any concerns or causes in this world that you think are worth fighting for—the environment, social justice, education, human rights, health, democracy—then you need to engage in the fight against Jewish rule because it has a negative impact on virtually every other social issue.  To paraphrase Spengler, impotence is cowardice.

MISPLACED ANGER.  At this point, your friend is likely to start getting irritated—with you.  As a typical semi-thoughtful but uncritical television viewer, he has likely absorbed and internalized the conventional pro-Jewish mantra:  Jews are a beleaguered and innocent people who have been unjustly attacked over the centuries, most notably during the Holocaust, and thus we owe them vast amends.  Furthermore, being a typically decent person, he thinks that anyone attacking Jews, or any minorities, is a morally-deficient racist or neo-Nazi—and now, this is you!  For God’s sake, everybody hates a racist!  Even Tucker Carlson hates racists!—as he informs us every night, in his unthinking, dim-witted, and duplicitous manner.  Since you clearly hate Jews, you are now officially a ‘hater.’  And everyone hates a hater—don’t they?

Sensing that he has lost the argument, your friend then launches into either subtle or overt ad hominem attacks against you.  Rational discussion is out the window, and emotion rules the day.  You are now simply a ‘bad person’; no further need to debate with you.  Having demonstrated your incivility and cruel-heartedness, you are either pitied or detested.  Critically, the focus has shifted to you; Jews are suddenly nowhere in sight, even though this was the sole issue at hand.  They are suddenly off the hook.  How convenient; the Jews themselves couldn’t have scripted a better outcome.

Sadly, many people remain stuck in this mode for a long time, perhaps for their entire lives.  They never address the real issue, but continue only to think negatively of you and you alone.  This is a relatively good outcome for them; the social problem is not a multitude of wealthy, powerful, and ethnocentric Jews, but little ol’ you, and perhaps a few of your like-minded hater friends.  It’s much easier, and much less threatening, to deal with you and your “ilk,” rather than a potent, dispersed, malevolent force like world Jewry.

Sometimes, though, and often in surprising ways, there is a shift in attitude.  Your friend becomes curious.  He investigates, he reads, he asks questions.  Slowly, slowly, he comes around to your side.  “You know, I’ve been thinking, and I think you’re on to something.  Those Jews are everywhere, once you learn how to spot them.  No one criticizes them.  No one questions the Holocaust.  No one is even willing to simply name the Jews.  They get away with everything…”  Thus we arrive, with luck, at ACCEPTANCE.  Yes, Jews in fact dominate key sectors of society.  Yes, Jews in fact are the major wire-pullers in politics and business.  Yes, Jews couldn’t care less about human well-being, and they would just as soon cause mass suffering and even death, if it profited them in any way.  The denialism has been overcome.

Once at this phase, it is only a short step to the final stage: RIGHTEOUS ANGER—now against the real enemy—and corresponding ACTION.  Anyone with a conscience, with a sense of moral outrage, and with a larger sense of justice, will be utterly appalled at the situation.  They will now become activist, speaking out, writing, informing others.  They will develop the moral backbone to confront Jewish power and its proxies directly.  Being truly knowledgeable and well-informed, they will make a formidable opponent.  The movement will have taken one more small step forward.  And victory will be one day closer.

Constructing the Case

Given that nearly everyone begins at some level of the ‘denial’ stage, it is worthwhile to offer some specific facts that can help build the case against it.  The goal, again, is to show that Jews are massively disproportionate amongst the wealthy and powerful in society.  This is the core truth from which all the rest proceeds.  Fortunately, as I said, this is an entirely empirical matter.  Basic research will reveal the truth.  Of course, the names vary from nation to nation, and they change constantly over time.  A specific case must be made at a given point in time, and in a specific nation of interest.  Since I am an American, and the data here is extensive, let me briefly review the case in the present-day USA.  Even a cursory overview demonstrates the failure of denial.

We can separately examine four sectors of American society:  politics, academia, finance, and media.  In politics, we have a strong Jewish presence in all three branches of government–Congress, the White House, and the Supreme Court.  Regarding the latter, we currently have 2 Jews among the 9 justices:  Elena Kagan and Stephen Breyer.  Until the recent death of Ruth Bader-Ginsburg, the figure was 3 of 9, and if President Obama had had his way late in his final term, it would have been an astonishing 4 of 9, with Merrick Garland.  (We can be sure that any future Biden nominee will be Jewish.)

The current US Congress has 38 Jews among its combined 535 members, with 10 in the Senate and 28 in the House.  This constitutes around 7% of the Congressional total, versus an American Jewish population of some 6 million, or just under 2% of the nation.  Hence Jews are over-represented in Congress by a factor of 3.5, and in the Senate by a factor of 5.  The record high for Jewish representation, incidentally, occurred in the aftermath of the 2008 federal election, when fully 48 Jews held seats in Congress (15 Senate, 33 House).

The Biden administration, like that of Trump, Obama, Bush, and Clinton, has an extensive Jewish presence.  Start with the families of Biden and Kamala Harris.  Remarkably, all three of Biden’s adult children married Jews:  daughter Ashley married Howard Krein, son Hunter married “filmmaker” Melissa Cohen, and now-deceased son Beau married Hallie Olivere.  Correspondingly, three of Biden’s six grandchildren are half-Jews.  Biracial VP Kamala Harris married a Jewish lawyer, Doug Emhoff, back in 2014; thankfully, they have no children.

Biden’s sympathies to the Jews extend, of course, to his highest-level administrative positions.  Of 25 cabinet or cabinet-level positions, eight (32%) are held by Jews:  Tony Blinken, Alejandro Mayorkas, Janet Yellen, Merrick Garland (yes, that Merrick Garland), Ron Klain, Avril Haines (half), Isabel Guzman (half), and Eric Lander.  Other high-ranking Biden Jews include John Kerry (half), Rochelle Walensky of the CDC, Jeff Zients, Wendy Sherman, Gary Gensler of the SEC, David Cohen, “Rachel” Levine, Anne Neuberger, Andy Slavitt, Victoria Nuland, and Roberta Jacobson.  And this is not to mention Judeophilic Gentiles like Jake Sullivan, or Gentiles with Jewish spouses, like Samantha Power.  Below I offer some thoughts about why, exactly, this situation came to be.

What about academia?  Here is one remarkable indication:  It was recently noted that of the eight Ivy League schools—Harvard, Yale, Princeton, Columbia, Penn, Brown, Cornell, and Dartmouth—fully seven have Jewish presidents.  In other words, 88% of these elite schools are run by Jews.  We can be sure that this Jewish orientation then extends down into provosts and deans who are disproportionately Jewish, into faculty members who are disproportionately Jewish, and into the very curriculum itself, which undoubtedly caters to liberal-left Jewish interests.

Then consider university faculty more broadly.  In an article published in 2006, Schuster and Finkelstein found that “25% of research university faculty are Jewish, compared to 10% of all faculty.”[1]  An older study by Steinberg[2] found that 17.2 percent of faculty at “high ranking” universities were Jewish.  By a different assessment, Harriett Zuckerman[3] examined just the “elite” scientific and research faculty.  She found the following, by major discipline:

Law                 36% Jewish
Sociology         34% Jewish
Economics       28% Jewish
Physics            26% Jewish
Poli Sci             24% Jewish

What about students?  Experience shows that when Jews constitute more than just a few percent of the student body, they begin to dominate campus life.  As it happens, there are nine major American universities with over 20% Jewish undergrads (in descending order: Brandeis, Tulane, CUNY-Brooklyn, Binghamton, Queens College, George Washington University, Columbia, Boston University, and Washington University-St. Louis).  And there are another 23 major schools with more than 10% Jews (Maryland, American University, Brown, University of Miami, Rutgers, University of Florida, Cornell, Penn, Syracuse, Michigan, New York University, Northwestern, University of Hartford, Wisconsin, Yale, Indiana, UC-Santa Barbara, Duke, University at Albany, Harvard, Cal State-Northridge, Florida State, and USC).  Hence we have 32 major American universities, representing the intellectual elite of the nation, with a hugely disproportionate Jewish presence, top to bottom.  Again, this in a nation of scarcely 2% Jews.

Consider, next, the realm of finance and wealth.  When we run down the list of wealthiest Americans, we find a striking fact:  around half of them are Jews.  Among the top ten, we find five Jews:  Mark Zuckerberg, Larry Page, Sergey Brin, Larry Ellison, and Michael Bloomberg.  Of the top 50 richest men, at least 27 are Jews, including Steve Ballmer, Michael Dell, Carl Icahn, David Newhouse, Micki Arison, and Stephen Ross.[4]  The combined wealth of these 27 individuals comes to roughly $635 billion.  Note: If Jews were proportionately represented among the top 50, there would be one individual; instead, there are 27.

More broadly, we can infer that this “50% rule” holds throughout much of the wealth hierarchy.  In support, we may cite Benjamin Ginsberg, who wrote, “Today, though barely 2% of the [American] nation’s population is Jewish, close to half its billionaires are Jews.”[5]  At present, there are something like 615 American billionaires, which implies around 300 Jewish billionaires.

Or perhaps the figures are even worse than we suspect.  A recent study of the most malicious “vulture” capitalists showed a heavy preponderance of Jewish names, far more than half.  And one ranking from a few years ago of the richest hedge fund managers in the US listed 32 individuals by name; of these, at least 24 (75%) are Jews.  It seems that the more we look, the worse it gets.

Even more impressively, consider total private wealth.  In 2018, the total assets of all private households in the US hit $100 trillion for the first time ever.  The 50% rule suggests that the 6 million or so American Jews own or control, in total, some $50 trillion.  This works out to an average of $8 million for every Jewish man, woman, and child—a truly astonishing figure.

So much for Jewish wealth.  More importantly, these various sectors are deeply interconnected.  Jewish wealth is directly related to Jewish political influence.  Take, for example, Joe Biden’s top political donors.  It turns out, unsurprisingly, that the vast majority of Biden’s political donations came from Jewish billionaires.  As Andrew Joyce writes, “of [his] top 22 donors, at least 18 are Jews,” followed by the list of names.  This is perhaps extreme but not surprising, given that Jews overall provide at least 50% of Democratic political funding, and at least 25% of Republican funds.  These are truly disturbing numbers for anyone who cares about political corruption.  Note that there are literally hundreds of lobby groups, all donating to their favored candidates.  And yet one lobby—the Jewish Lobby—provides 25 to 50%, or more, of major candidate funding.  Imagine if, say, half of your income came from one person, and the other half came from a mix of 200 other individuals; who would you listen to?  The answer is obvious.

Finally, take the media.  Hollywood, as we all know, has long been a Jewish domain—reaching back to its origins in the 1910s and 1920s.  It was constructed by the likes of Carl Laemmle (Universal Pictures), Adolph Zukor, Jesse Lasky, Daniel and Charles Frohman, and Samuel Goldwyn (Paramount), William Fox (Fox Films, later 20th Century Fox), and the four “Warner” Brothers—in reality, the Wonskolaser clan:  Jack, Harry, Albert, and Sam.  They were soon followed by Marcus Loew (MGM), William Paley (CBS), and Harry and Jack Cohn (Columbia), establishing nearly complete Jewish control over the film business.

Today the situation is little changed—and is neither disputed nor even controversial.  A notable story published in the LA Times in 2008 openly proclaimed that “Jews totally run Hollywood”.[6]  It investigated every major studio and found nothing but Jewish bosses.  Today the names have changed, but not the ethnicities.  A recent survey of major executives or owners reveals the following:

20th Century Studios  (S. Asbell)
Paramount  (S. Redstone)
Disney Studies  (A. Bergman, A. Horn)
Warner Bros Studios  (T. Emmerich, A. Sarnoff, R. Kavanaugh)
MGM  (M. De Luca)
Sony Pictures  (T. Rothman, S. Panitch, J. Greenstein)
Lionsgate  (M. Rachesky, J. Feltheimer)
Relativity Media  (D. Robbins)
Millennium Media  (A. Lerner)
The Chernin Group  (P. Chernin)
Amblin Partners  (S. Spielberg)
Participant  (J. Skoll, D. Linde)
Sister  (S. Snider, E. Murdoch)
Spyglass  (G. Barber)
Glickmania  (J. Glickman)

As before, all of these individuals are Jews.[7]  With such dominance, we should scarcely be surprised to find pro-Jewish themes repeatedly appear in film:  from the Holocaust and the ‘evil Nazis,’ to the Arab and Muslim ‘terrorists,’ to the ignorant and corrupt Whites, to support for various socially and ethically degrading behavior such as casual sex, homosexuality, interracial couples and families, recreational drug use, crude materialism, and rampant multiculturalism.  All these themes serve Jewish interests.

The overall media situation is even more telling.  The five largest media conglomerates in the US are:  1) Disney, 2) Warner Media, 3) NBC Universal, 4) Viacom CBS, and 5) Fox Corporation.  A look at their owners, largest shareholders, and top officers is revealing:

  • DisneyRobert Iger, executive chairman; Alan Horn, Chair, Disney Studios; Alan Braverman, exec VP; Peter Rice, chair, Content; Dana Walden, chair, ABC; Lowell Singer, senior VP.
  • WarnerJason Kilar, CEO; David Levy, Pres, Turner Broadcasting; Jeff Zucker, Pres, CNN; Ann Sarnoff, CEO, Warner Pictures; Michael Lynton, chair, Warner Music (Parent company:  AT&T:  John Stankey, CEO).
  • NBC Universal:  Jeff Shell, CEO; Robert Greenblatt, Chair, NBC Entertainment; Bonnie Hammer, Chair, Cable Entertainment; Noah Oppenheim, president, NBC News; Mark Lazarus, Chair, Sports; Ron Meyer, Vice Chair, NBCUniversal  (Parent company:  Comcast:  Brian Roberts, CEO).
  • Viacom CBS:  An unusual situation:  Viacom is a “public” company but voting stock is 100% owned by Shari Redstone and the heirs of Sumner Redstone.  Leading individuals include David Nevins, CCO; Susan Zirinsky, president, CBS News; David Stapf, president, CBS TV.
  • Fox Corporation:  Similar to Viacom, a public company but 39% of voting stock is owned by Rupert Murdoch and Lachlan Murdoch.

All of these individuals are Jewish, with the possible exception of the Murdochs—although it seems certain that they are at least part-Jewish.[8]  And given the difficulty in ascertaining ethnicity, Jewish influence is certainly greater than shown here.  Hence the above is undoubtedly a conservative estimate.  It furthermore says nothing about the many Jewish underlings who implement day-to-day decisions.  Once again, it’s difficult to convey the degree of dominance here.  These five corporations produce the vast majority of all media consumed in the US, which includes all of the major news outlets and most of the major Hollywood studios.  In fact, Jewish leadership or ownership at the top translates all throughout the organization, to middle-managers, staffers, reporters, television personalities, and editors.  It has a very concrete effect on how the media is produced, what is presented, and what is not presented.  It affects who we see, and who we don’t see.

And it’s not only the so-called liberal media outlets.  The conservative venues also are dominated by Jewish interests—typically, via right-wing or neo-conservative Jews.  Fox News, and its parent corporation Fox, owned and operated by the Murdoch family, is every bit as pro-Jewish and pro-Israel as the liberal outlets.  Fox News anchors disagree vehemently with just about every liberal position, and yet, remarkably, they are fully on-board with all Jewish issues.  They struggle to outdo their peers at CNN and MSNBC in their obeisance to Jewish and Israeli interests.[9]  This, again, is no coincidence.  It is evidence of Jewish domination of American media, across the political spectrum and across all venues.

In addition to the above, various other media are also well-represented by American Jews.  Among newspapers, the New York Times has been Jewish-owned and -managed since Adolph Ochs bought the paper in 1896; the current owner, publisher, and chairman is Arthur G. Sulzberger.  US News and World Report is owned by Mort Zuckerman.  Time magazine is owned by Warner Media, and its current chief editor is Edward Felsenthal.  Advance Publications is a mini media conglomerate entirely owned and operated by the Jewish Newhouse family; it manages a wide array of venues including Conde Nast (Vogue, The New Yorker, GQ, Glamour, Architectural Digest, Vanity Fair, Pitchfork, Wired, and Bon Appetit), Discovery Channel, Lycos, and Redditt.  And in broadcast media, we have National Public Radio (NPR), which has long been a Jewish preserve; its on-air staff is unquestionably more than half Jewish.[10]

I think we can put to rest all thoughts of denialism here.

Is Jewish Dominance Irrelevant?

If we then proceed to stage two, Irrelevance, we must counter the view that Jewish dominance is inconsequential.  Again, from the naïve standpoint, Jews predominating in government, academia, finance, and media seems not to matter.  These Jews are largely invisible as Jews, and their Jewishness is rarely displayed explicitly.  As before, the influence is generally manifest in myriad subtle ways—in which voices and views are presented (and which not presented), which individuals are allowed to speak (and which not allowed), which values are projected as good and positive, which causes are worthy of attention, and so on.

The central issues here are (a) that Jews tend to work collectively, in their own best interests, and (b) that they tend to have little regard for all non-Jews, and they tend to hold particular contempt for White Europeans, who have, historically speaking, proven to be their most formidable opponents.  Jews work tribally, as a pack; they assist each other in attacking and undermining all perceived enemies.  Jews in finance and academic Jews can count on media Jews to give them positive coverage and to downplay or bury any negative stories.  Media Jews will slander an enemy even as finance Jews put the squeeze to that person’s employer.  It can be very effective when multiple actors in a trillion-dollar cabal are arrayed against you.

On occasion, these dominant Jews will indeed fight with each other, as when conservative right-wing Jews spar with their liberal leftwing brethren—such as the recent rift between the rightwing Murdoch Jews and the left-wing ADL Jews, especially Jonathan Greenblatt, over comments by Tucker Carlson.  But this is only an internal dispute about the best way to promote Jewish interests, nothing more.  Much of current political confrontation is mere show; Democratic-Republican squabbles are meaningless when both sides are backed by wealthy Jews.  And Jews across the political spectrum love to use Gentile lackeys like Anderson Cooper, Chris Cuomo, Chris Hayes, Sean Hannity, and yes, Tucker Carlson, to cover for them.  This again serves to obscure the real power structure.

But the fact that powerful Jews work with each other, against all others, is a well-established historical fact that has been well-attested, over the centuries, by some of the West’s most brilliant thinkers.  This topic literally requires a book-length treatment—see my book Eternal Strangers: Critical Views of Jews and Judaism through the Ages (2020), which is the first to fully document the historical record.  It dates back over 2,000 years, at least to remarks by Hecateus of Abdera and Theophrastus circa 300 BC, proceeding to the likes of Cicero, Seneca, Tacitus, Porphyry, Thomas Aquinas, Martin Luther, Voltaire, Rousseau, Fichte, Kant, Hegel, Schopenhauer, Bakunin, Nietzsche, Mark Twain, H. G. Wells, Heidegger, and chess genius (and half-Jew) Bobby Fischer, among many others.  It is an impressive list.

The criticisms are uniformly blunt and damning.  Jews are “misanthropic and hostile to foreigners,” “the very vilest of mankind,” “look upon all other men as their enemies,” “an accursed race,” “the basest of peoples.”  They are profoundly and deeply different—in a bad way—from the rest of humanity.  Medieval theologians condemned the Jews for their usury and their abuse of Christians and Christianity.  Luther called them “a heavy burden, a plague, a pestilence, a sheer misfortune,” adding that “we are at fault in not slaying them.”  For Voltaire, they “display an irreconcilable hatred against all nations”; for Rousseau, the Jewish race was “always a foreigner amongst other men.”  German philosopher Johann Herder called them “a widely diffused republic of cunning usurers.”  Kant saw them as “a nation of deceivers.”  Schopenhauer was especially blunt:  “scum of humanity—but great master of lies.”  Heidegger captured the situation well in just three words: “planetary master criminals”.[11]

This 2,000-year history of hatred and contempt for the rest of humanity is played out in the present day, though with much stealth and deception.  Jews often work in the background, hidden, out of the limelight; they are, as Hitler said, the “wire-pullers” (Drahtzieher) of contemporary society, using money and power to steer events in their favor.  History tells us that Jews will stoop to anything—the most heinous, the most egregious, the most unethical—to promote their ends.  Even war: there is an equally long and damning history of Jewish involvement in wars, from the Jewish-Roman wars in the first and second centuries to the present-day “war on terror”.[12]  This is not speculation; all these facts are well-attested and well-documented.  We need only do a basic bit of reading, from reputable sources.

The bottom line, of course, is that Jewish over-representation in major sectors of society does matter—it matters very much.  Arguably it is the root cause of virtually all our present-day social problems, all of which have been created or exacerbated by powerful Jews.  We can scarcely imagine what life could be like without their manipulating and malevolent presence.

This brief account of pernicious Jewish influence should help lay to rest the “irrelevance” stage.  But impotence need not be the consequence.  Accept the reality, and turn your anger onto the real targets.  And then act.  Bear in mind:  Every Jewish victory in past centuries has been ephemeral, and has instead been transformed into concrete action against the Hebrews—isolation, ghettoization, incarceration, expulsion, or worse.  And so it will be this time.  Either the Jews themselves will recognize that they are on the brink and voluntarily retreat to their “homeland” in Palestine, or else native peoples around the world will, once again, take action.

The path to enlightenment is hard.  And yet it must be pursued, if humanity is to flourish and prosper.

Thomas Dalton, PhD, has authored or edited several books and articles on politics, history, and religion, with a special focus on National Socialism in Germany.  His works include a new translation series of Mein Kampf, and the books Eternal Strangers (2020), The Jewish Hand in the World Wars (2019), and Debating the Holocaust (4th ed, 2020), all available at  For all his writings, see his personal website

[1] J. Schuster and M. Finkelstein, The American Faculty (2006), p. 66.

[2] S. Steinberg, The Academic Melting Pot (1974), p. 103.

[3] H. Zuckerman, Scientific Elite (1977).

[4] Bloomberg Billionaires Index (2018).

[5] The Fatal Embrace (1993), p. 1.

[6] “How Jewish is Hollywood?” (19 Dec 2008).

[7] Until recently, we could have included the Weinstein Company (aka Lantern Entertainment), but the sex scandal surrounding Harvey Weinstein drove the corporation into bankruptcy in early 2018.

[8] Rupert’s mother, Elisabeth Joy Greene, appears to have been Jewish.  See here, here, and here.  We could also cite Rupert Murdoch’s award from the heavily-Jewish group ADL in 2010, and his son James’ $1 million donation to the same group in 2017.  If the Murdochs are not Jewish, they are in very good graces with them.

[9] Sean Hannity is particularly egregious in this respect.

[10] Current and recent individuals include, at a minimum:  N. Adams, H. Berkes, M. Block, D. Brooks, A. Cheuse, A. Codrescu, K. Coleman, O. Eisenberg, D. Elliott, D. Estrin, S. Fatsis, P. Fessler, C. Flintoff, D. Folkenflik, R. Garfield, T. Gjelten, B. Gladstone, I. Glass, T. Goldman, J. Goldstein, J. Goldstein, R. Goldstein, D. Greene, N. Greenfieldboyce, T. Gross, M. Hirsh, S. Inskeep, I. Jaffe, A. Kahn, C. Kahn, M. Kaste, A. Katz, M. Keleman, D. Kestenbaum, N. King, B. Klein, T. Koppel, A. Kuhn, B. Littlefield, N. King, N. Pearl, P. Sagal, M. Schaub, A. Shapiro, J. Shapiro, W. Shortz, R. Siegel, A. Silverman, S. Simon, A. Spiegel, S. Stamberg, R. Stein, L. Sydell, D. Temple-Raston, N. Totenberg, G. Warner, D. Welna, L. Wertheimer, D. Wessel, E. Westervelt, B. Wolf, and D. Zwerdling.

[11] For an enlightening list of some 50 such quotations, see the website of Clemens and Blair, LLC publishing (here).

[12] See my book The Jewish Hand in the World Wars (2019).

Source for the original article:

Posted in the-jewish-question | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

Private Criminal Prosecution Papers Laid Alleging Pandemic Fraud Against Hancock, Whitty, Vallance & Ferguson

From The Bernician:

“At 16:23 pm this afternoon (19th March 2021), one year after the Advisory Committee on Dangerous Pathogens’ decision to reclassify COVID-19 as no longer being considered a High Consequence Infectious Disease was published by Public Health England, the papers were laid electronically at a south London Magistrates Court, in the People’s Union of Britain’s momentous Private Criminal Prosecution against Matt Hancock, Chris Whitty, Patrick Vallance and Neil Ferguson for pandemic fraud.

“Early next week, the court will receive a 1,200 page bundle of evidence, which includes expert witness statements from two professors, three doctors, a dental surgeon, a probate solicitor, a mathematician, a retired nuclear submarine data analyst, an independent data analyst and a former CID fraud detective, who is acting as a trustee of the PUB in bringing this most serious of prosecutions to the criminal court.

Declaration Sought

“In addition to the charges of fraud by false representation and non-disclosure, in material breaches of sections 2 and 3 of the Fraud Act 2006, we are informally applying for a declaration, under the inherent powers of the court, which states that autopsies are to be carried out for all alleged COVID deaths, which will be held as evidence in the forthcoming trial, on the ground that we have expert witness testimony of the falsification of death certificates, as per UK Government policy.

“We are also asking for a moratorium on the UK flu and COVID ‘vaccinations’ programmes to be declared for period of at least 90 days, in order to definitively establish whether it is COVID-19 or ‘vaccines’ that are killing people at a minimum mortality rate of 377 per 100,000 healthy adults, as per the leaked WHO approved ‘vaccine’ safety study which we are adducing into evidence.

Boatload of Prima Facie Evidence

“They told us they wanted more prima facie evidence when we made the last application in late 2020, seeking the arrest of Matt Hancock for fraud by non-disclosure over the declassification of COVID-19 by the ACDP.

“Well, now they have a veritable boatload of the stuff heading their way, so prepare yourselves for the inevitable shitstorm on the near horizon, after the defendants’ QC’s tell them that their only defence is to plead gross negligence. However, the evidence is so emphatic that they knew exactly what they were doing that the jury will almost certainly convict them as charged.

“Nevertheless, don’t expect the defendants to be wheeled off in handcuffs to Belmarsh by tomorrow morning. Whilst it is just about conceivable that the court’s legal department could make an initial assessment of the case by the end of next week, even if it happens that swiftly, the matter will then be passed to the Chief Magistrate of the UK’s legal department, which will probably take at least another week to make their assessment.

Potential Turnaround

“In the event all of that is turned around within the next two weeks, the case would then be passed to a senior district judge, who must then decide whether to grant the applications for the summonses and the declaration, whether on paper or at a hearing.

“If the summons application is granted, a pleading hearing would then be listed to take place within the next couple of weeks. This would take us to 28 days from now and probably represents the earliest time that the defendants will be summonsed to plead in the Magistrates Court. The informal application for the declaration would also be dealt with at that hearing.

“Given the seriousness of the charges and the urgency of the situation, with clear evidence of fraud with murderous consequences already adduced into evidence, we will then ask the court to list a trial by jury at the very earliest opportunity, which will almost certainly take place at the Old Bailey.

“If and when all of that transpires rests on the judgment of a single district judge, who will necessarily have experience dealing with such serious charges. However, it is the considered opinion of the former CID fraud detective and the team behind the scenes who have supported me every step of the way that the Statement of Case is “monumental”, “truly historical” and:

“Regardless of the judiciary’s response to it, once the information is in the public realm/consciousness, along with the cited evidence, it will be incendiary. The accused will squeal like the little swines they are.”

Banged To Rights

“Well it’s been a long month already, to say the least, which is why I haven’t really posted much online for the past three weeks. So I’m going to keep this post relatively brief.

“Before I sign off, to reflect on the truly extraordinary progress we have made during the course of the past dystopian year, it seems somewhat fitting to leave you with this.

“If I’d had the evidential weight we have in this case in my family’s High Court actions against Bank of Scotland, it would have taken a year to beat them, instead of almost a decade.

“Suffice to say, in the words of Vinnie Jones’ character in Lock Stock & Two Smokin’ Barrels, a film which reminds me of when I was living and working in swinging nineties London, when these ancient lands were still a place where even a committed recalcitrant like myself could live freely in relative peace and prosperity – it’s been emotional.”

The Bernician

For The Truth, that is, Real Christianity go here:

Posted in Private Criminal Prosecutions | Tagged , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

The Psychology Of The Conspiracy Denier By Tim Foyle

Why is it that otherwise perfectly intelligent, thoughtful and rationally minded people baulk at the suggestion that sociopaths are conspiring to manipulate and deceive them? And why will they defend this ill-founded position with such vehemence?

History catalogues the machinations of liars, thieves, bullies and narcissists and their devastating effects. In modern times too, evidence of corruption and extraordinary deceptions abound.

We know, without question, that politicians lie and hide their connections and that corporations routinely display utter contempt for moral norms – that corruption surrounds us.

We know that revolving doors between the corporate and political spheres, the lobbying system, corrupt regulators, the media and judiciary mean that wrongdoing is practically never brought to any semblance of genuine justice.

We know that the press makes noise about these matters occasionally but never pursues them with true vigour.

We know that in the intelligence services and law enforcement wrongdoing on a breathtaking scale is commonplace and that, again, justice is never forthcoming.

We know that governments repeatedly ignore or trample on the rights of the people, and actively abuse and mistreat the people. None of this is controversial.

So exactly what is it that conspiracy deniers refuse to acknowledge with such fervour, righteousness and condescension? Why, against all the evidence, do they sneeringly and contemptuously defend the crumbling illusion that ‘the great and good’ are up there somewhere, have everything in hand, have only our best interests at heart, and are scrupulous, wise and sincere? That the press serves the people and truth rather than the crooks? That injustice after injustice result from mistakes and oversights, and never from that dread word: conspiracy?

What reasonable person would continue to inhabit such a fantasy world?

The point of disagreement here is only on the matter of scale. Someone who is genuinely curious about the plans of powerful sociopaths won’t limit the scope of their curiosity to, for example, one corporation, or one nation. Why would they? Such a person assumes that the same patterns on display locally are likely to be found all the way up the power food chain. But the conspiracy denier insists this is preposterous.


It is painfully obvious that the pyramidical societal and legal structures that humanity has allowed to develop are exactly the kind of dominance hierarchies that undoubtedly favour the sociopath. A humane being operating with a normal and healthy cooperative mindset has little inclination to take part in the combat necessary to climb a corporate or political ladder.

So what do conspiracy deniers imagine the 70 million or more sociopaths in the world do all day, born into a ‘game’, in which all the wealth and power are at the top of the pyramid, while the most effective attributes for ‘winning’ are ruthlessness and amorality? Have they never played Monopoly?

Sociopaths do not choose their world-view consciously, and are simply unable to comprehend why normal people would put themselves at such an incredible disadvantage by limiting themselves with conscientiousness and empathy, which are as beyond the understanding of the sociopath as a world without them are to the humane being.

All the sociopath need do to win in the game is lie publicly whilst conspiring privately. What could be simpler? In 2021, to continue to imagine that the world we inhabit is not largely driven by this dynamic amounts to reckless naiveté bordering on insanity. Where does such an inadvertently destructive impulse originate?

The infant child places an innate trust in those it finds itself with – a trust which is, for the most part, essentially justified. The infant could not survive otherwise.

In a sane and healthy society, this deep instinct would evolve as the psyche developed. As self-awareness, the cognitive and reasoning abilities and scepticism evolved in the individual, this innate trust impulse would continue to be understood as a central need of the psyche. Shared belief systems would exist to consciously evolve and develop this childish impulse in order to place this faith somewhere consciously – in values and beliefs of lasting meaning and worth to the society, the individual, or, ideally, both.

Reverence and respect for tradition, natural forces, ancestors, for reason, truth, beauty, liberty, the innate value of life, or the initiating spirit of all things, might all be considered valid resting places in which to consciously place our trust and faith – as well as those derived from more formalised belief systems.

Regardless of the path taken to evolve and develop a personal faith, it is the bringing of one’s own consciousness and cognition to this innate impulse that is relevant here. I believe this is a profound responsibility – to develop and cultivate a mature faith – which many are, understandably, unaware of.

What occurs when there is a childish need within us which has never evolved beyond its original survival function of trusting those in our environment who are, simply, the most powerful; the most present and active? When we have never truly explored our own psyches, and deeply interrogated what we truly believe and why? When our motivation for trusting anything or anyone goes unchallenged? When philosophy is left to the philosophers?

I suggest the answer is simple, and that the evidence of this phenomenon and the havoc it is wreaking is all around us: the innate impulse to trust the mother never evolves, never encounters and engages with its counterbalance of reason (or mature faith), and remains forever on its ‘default’ infant setting.

While the immature psyche no longer depends on parents for its well-being, the powerful and motivating core tenet I have described remains intact: unchallenged, unconsidered and undeveloped. And, in a world in which stability and security are distant memories, these survival instincts, rather than being well-honed, considered, relevant, discerning and up to date, remain, quite literally, those of a baby. Trust is placed in the biggest, loudest, most present and undeniable force around, because instinct decrees that survival depends on it.

And, in this great ‘world nursery’, the most omnipresent force is the network of institutions which consistently project an unearned image of power, calm, expertise, concern and stability.

In my view, this is how conspiracy deniers are able to cling to and aggressively defend the utterly illogical fantasy that somehow – above a certain undefined level of the societal hierarchy – corruption, deceit, malevolence and narcissism mysteriously evaporate. That, contrary to the maxim, the more power a person has, the more integrity they will inevitably exhibit. These poor deluded souls essentially believe that where personal experience and prior knowledge cannot fill in the gaps in their worldview – in short, where there is a barred door – mummy and daddy are behind it, working out how best to ensure that their little precious will be comfortable, happy and safe forever.

This is the core, comforting illusion at the root of the conspiracy denier’s mindset, the decrepit foundation upon which they build a towering castle of justification from which to pompously jeer at and mock those who see otherwise.

This explains why it is that the conspiracy denier will attack any suggestion that the care giving archetype is no longer present – that sociopaths are behind the barred door, who hold us all in utter contempt or disregard us completely. The conspiracy denier will attack any such suggestion as viciously as if their survival depended on it – which, in a way, within the make-up of their unconscious and precarious psyche, it does.

Their sense of well-being, of security, of comfort, even of a future at all, is completely (and completely unconsciously) invested in this fantasy. The infant has never matured, and, because they are not conscious of this, other than as a deep attachment to their personal security, they will fiercely attack any threat to this unconscious and central aspect of their world-view.

The tediously common refrain from the conspiracy denier is, ‘there couldn’t be a conspiracy that big’.

The simple retort to such a self-professed expert on conspiracies is obvious: how big?

The biggest ‘medical’ corporations in the world can go for decades treating the settling of court cases as mere business expenses, for crimes ranging from the suppressing of adverse test events to multiple murders resulting from undeclared testing to colossal environmental crimes.

Governments perform the vilest and most unthinkable ‘experiments’ (crimes) on their own people without consequence.

Politicians habitually lie to our faces, without consequence.

And on and on. At what point, exactly, does a conspiracy become so big that ‘they’ just couldn’t get away with it, and why? I suggest it’s at the point where the cognitive ability of the conspiracy denier falters, and their unconscious survival instinct kicks in. The point at which the intellect becomes overwhelmed with the scope of events and the instinct is to settle back into the familiar comforting faith known and cultivated since the first moment one’s lips found the nipple. The faith that someone else is dealing with it – that where the world becomes unknown to us, a powerful and benevolent human authority exists in which we have only to place our faith unconditionally in order to guarantee eternal emotional security.

This dangerous delusion may be the central factor placing humanity’s physical security and future in the hands of sociopaths.

To anyone in the habit of dismissing people who are questioning, investigative and sceptical as tin foil hat wearing, paranoid, science-denying Trump supporters, the question is: what do you believe in? Where have you placed your faith and why? How is it that while no one trusts governments, you appear to trust nascent global governance organisations without question? How is this rational?

If you are placing faith in such organisations, consider that in the modern global age, these organisations, as extraordinarily well presented as they are, are simply grander manifestations of the local versions we know we can’t trust. They are not our parents and demonstrate no loyalty to humane values. There is no reason to place any faith whatsoever in any of them.

If you haven’t consciously developed a faith or questioned why you believe as you do to some depth, such a position might seem misanthropic, but in truth, it is the opposite. These organisations have not earned your trust with anything other than PR money and glossy lies. True power remains, as ever, with the people.

There is a reason why Buddhists strongly advise the placing of one’s faith in the Dharma, or the natural law of life, rather than in persons, and that similar refrains are common in other belief systems.

Power corrupts. And, in the world today, misplaced and unfounded trust could well be one of the greatest sources of power there is.

Massive criminal conspiracies exist. The evidence is overwhelming. The scope of those currently underway is unknown, but there is no reason to imagine, in the new global age, that the sociopathic quest for power or the possession of the resources required to move towards it is diminishing. Certainly not while dissent is mocked and censored into silence by gatekeepers, ‘useful idiots’, and conspiracy deniers, who are, in fact, directly colluding with the sociopathic agenda through their unrelenting attack on those who would shine a light on wrongdoing.

It is every humane being’s urgent responsibility to expose sociopathic agendas wherever they exist – never to attack those who seek to do so.

Now, more than ever, it is time to put away childish things, and childish impulses, and to stand up as adults to protect the future of the actual children who have no choice but to trust us with their lives.

This essay has focussed on what I consider to be the deepest psychological driver of conspiracy denial.

There are certainly others, such as the desire to be accepted; the avoidance of knowledge of, and engagement with, the internal and external shadow; the preservation of a positive and righteous self-image: a generalised version of the ‘flying monkey’ phenomenon, in which a self-interested and vicious class protect themselves by coalescing around the bully; the subtle unconscious adoption of the sociopathic worldview (e.g. ‘humanity is the virus’); outrage addiction/superiority complex/status games; a stunted or unambitious intellect that finds validation through maintaining the status quo; the dissociative protective mechanism of imagining that crimes and horrors committed repeatedly within our lifetime are somehow not happening now, not ‘here’; and plain old fashioned laziness and cowardice.

My suggestion is that, to some degree, all of these build on the foundation of the primary cause I’ve outlined here.

Original article here:

For The Truth, that is, Real Christianity go here:

Posted in Conspiracies | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Is David Icke a Member of Antifa?

Strange question do you think? Well I hope not, for when I have finished this short but conclusive article, you should begin to see The Light, especially when it comes to the UK’s master of disinformation and misinformation.

First, though, lets be clear about these Soros Jew financed, Communist sewer rats who make up the membership of Antifa, for their title means just one thing – ANTI-FASCIST. Fascist being a label which they pin on anyone that’s not an unhinged satanic PC Cultural Marxist.

OK, so returning to David Icke, what do we hear from him with great regularity in his never ending diatribes – “Fascist this and Fascist that, Nazi this and Nazi that.” Not forgetting, too, the ‘book burning’ mantra that he also throws in with his “Nazi this and Nazi that” rabid mouth foaming. Never mind that all the books the German National Socialists did burn, needed burning, but that point we will never hear from the lick-spittle Mr Antifa David Icke!

So who does Mr Antifa David Icke work for, now that we know that he’s an outright Cultural Marxist Communist? Some say he’s a Jesuit gatekeeper and that may be correct, but my money, if I were a gambler, would be on him being a shabbos goy agent for The Tribe. I won’t call him a useful idiot, for he is certainly no idiot, but he is very useful for the nation of the Jews.

I will post this quote to help make my point:

“Dealing with The Jews requires a Jewish primer on how the Jews talk and how they use certain words:

1) “Fascist.” Jews call someone a fascist when that person prevents the Jews from taking control of the politics of a particular nation.

2) “Fascism.” The political status of a particular nation that keeps the Jews in their place and out of power.

“There is not a single instance when the Jews have not fully deserved the bitter fruit of the fury of their persecutors….We come to the nations pretending to escape persecution, we [Jews] are the most deadly persecutors in all the wretched annals of men.”

— Samuel Roth, Jewish writer, Jews Must Live (NY,NY: The Golden Hind Press Inc., 1934) pp. 64-65

So, Mr Antifa David Icke calls the worldwide Powers That Be, Fascists. How does that work exactly? and oh that they were! The Powers That Be are the Internationalist Jews (globalists) with their banking, media and Jewdicial stranglehold and their political, shabbos goy, errand boy traitors, and all of them are PC Cultural Jew Marxist scum, and here he is calling them Fascists? Do you see the confusion that Antifa Icke is sowing here?

Now here’s another thing, a Fascist system usually has a dictator ruling alone without any so-called democratic electoral system in place. So again here we have Antifa Icke behaving like an ignoramus calling so-called democratically elected politicians – Fascists, when they represent the exact opposite of a Fascist system – a Communist Stasi enforced system. So yet more confusion being sown by our home grown disso Mr Antifa David Icke.

If we then pin this down, we have Mr Antifa David Icke doing The Jew’s dirty work, by calling our so-called democratic leaders, Fascists, who in turn definitely do not keep the Jews out of power, nor out of powerful positions in the media and commerce. A good example here from the past would be Mrs Thatcher’s cabinet which had 6 Jews in it, and today we have Boris Johnsonstein, a Turkish Jew and Dominic Raab another Jew and no doubt there will be more Jews in his cabinet and certainly a whole lot more than a few Jews in both houses of government.

Ironically the only place where you will find Fascists today, apart from Turkey, is in Israel, which is a rabid nationalist Fascist state that unrelentingly persecutes the indigenous Palestinians.

I trust you can now see The Light.


For The Truth, that is, Real Christianity go here:

Posted in david icke, Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Brand New Tube, Real Name Brand Jew Tube, Exposed!

First of all my apologies for my lengthy absence, only I forgot my site access details so couldn’t sign in. At the same time my e-mail account died so I couldn’t use that as proof of rights to site access. Anyway after a prayer I did remember my details so here I am and back to business:

I never learn, do I? There was I, sucked in like a lemon to this new video platform with a heathen Muslim as its chief founder, delusionally thinking that it was going to be a free speech alternative to JewTube and what do I get today? This load of pusillanimous PC crap:

“We have received a Police notification to remove some of the videos promoting violence and targeting one particular religion and spreading hatred. We have removed those videos and we will do the same in the future. Kindly do not upload such videos on to your channels.”

Regards Team BNT

Upon receiving this into my notifications box I proceed immediately to upload this video:

“Anti-Semitism, It’s a Trick, We always use it.” – Shulamit Aloni, former Israeli Minister

Which they took down before it was published and, as you can see, is still up on Jewtube, so from this we can easily deduce which (((particular religion))) they are grovelling to, and in my opinion these satanic Muslim devils had it in for me and my Christian channel.

Interestingly, they didn’t post a copy of this alleged muppet notification, so could have been lying, but either way, we can see straight away what direction this controlled opposition shit show was, and is, going in. We need to get this reality firmly fixed in our minds folks that there is minimal genuine opposition out there, it’s nearly all controlled.

I believe this site is a text book case of taking captive disenchanted ex-Jewtubers and leading them down the proverbial Alice in Wonderland rabbit hole. Even more so than Bitchute and that’s saying something.

Anyway that’s my rant over, my account deleted from their poxy site, and you have been warned.

Best regards


PS. You can also find me here:

For The Truth, that is, Real Christianity go here:

Posted in Brand New Tube | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , | 4 Comments


Ever heard of that little gem before!? If not, let me enlighten you. Brexit Party is definitely not what it seems, for Brexit has NOTHING TO DO WITH IT!! Brexit Party is a front and is the latest JewTube channel that promulgates ‘Alt-Right’ bullshit.

Why and how is the ‘Alt-Right’, bullshit, I hear you ask? Quite simply because in the mainstream political cesspit there is no RIGHT WING at all. ALL the mainstream political parties are CULTURAL JEW MARXIST, pus filled sore, blots on the landscape – 100% COMMUNIST!

So with that TRUTH in mind, HOW CAN THERE BE AN “ALT-RIGHT” (Alt-Right meaning the Alternative-Right) So let me ask the question: How can there be an Alternative-Right (Alt-Right) when there is no Right Wing in the mainstream political circus for there to be an alternative to it? Does “The Alt-Right” therefore make any sense? Of course not, and it’s not meant to, for it’s ALL DESIGNED TO DECEIVE and lead awakening people down blind rabbit holes!

I’ve digressed, but a necessary digression, so back to more about the Brexit Party: The front man, a pale and pasty, lifeless looking individual, called Oliver appears to be orchestrating it, but I am wondering if there will be other devious bods in the background pulling his strings or pulling THE strings of the whole opperation. Perhaps we’ll hear from him denying it. Not that that matters.

So what’s my beef with this shady little operation? Well first off we have Mr Pale and Pasty, who is a fan of the disso site The UK Column = very dodgy indeed, inviting  people allegedly from the RIGHT, from across the globe, as guests on his podcasts, which can then go on for 2, 3 or even 4 hours. Now don’t get me wrong for some of these guests are the real deal, but others are definitely NOT, as I explain below:

Second off, we have Mr Pale and Pasty salivating over one of his podcast guests, a half-Jew, who calls himself….., now wait for it………”Jews for Hitler.” YOU WHAT!!!???? Yes you heard me right: “JEWS FOR HITLER” – ROTFLMAO!! How does that work, you could justifiably ask?

Not only that but this half-Jew claims that he’s a Christian and that Yashua Messiah (Jesus Christ) was a Jew. He also claims that the Jews are the chosen people when both claims are JEW LIES. (Links for my proof and evidence below.)

Third off, when yours truly challenges the provenance of this half-Jew liar in the comments section of the Brexit Party channel, yours truly gets his comments deleted by Mr Pale and Pasty. Nothing like free speech in the “Brave New World” of the Brexit Party JewTube podcast channel, eh?

Were Abraham, Isaac and Jacob/Israel, Jews?

Origins of the Royal Judahites and Canaanite Jews explained:

Yashua Messiah (Jesus Christ) was not a Jew:

I Know That (Ye Say) Ye Are Abraham’s Seed But Ye Seek To Kill Me!:


Salvation Is Of The Jews. Oh really, Is That So!?:

Posted in Brexit Party | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Daily Stormer is Controlled Opposition and Disinformation

Believe it or not but Andrew Anglin at the Daily Stormer believes the official account of the Paris ‘attacks’ by ‘Muslims’ on some two-bit satirical news outlet. Never mind that just like 9/11 there were all these handy people around, in the right places, with their cameras to record the Keystone Cops farce that we all witnessed.

There they were, those wicked Muslim terrorists, with their AK 47 assault rifles firing at point-blank range without so much as drop of policeman’s blood or signs of physical injury anywhere. Even if they had missed, a sizeable chunk of pavement would have been seen flying off to places unknown until some more muppets had been employed to find it. LOL You have to give it to ’em, if only for entertainment value.

However that’s not the point of this blog post, seen one false flag then you have seen ’em all – same old, same old, same old, just different places and different peeps, but just the same BS and the same distraction value. No, the point of this blog post is to reveal Andrew Anglin and his Daily Stormer internet rag for the charlatan disso page that it is.

On the face of it you would think The Daily Stormer is all very pro-white, anti-Jew and anti-black and yet to side with the official account of the Paris incident makes for very interesting reading indeed – here’s a sample of Anglin’s dissembling:

“I was mildly shocked to see the sheer numbers of people coming out and claiming that Moslems would never shoot up a news paper and thus the cartoon-killers must have been secret agents.”

Was this written by Anglin or The ADL??? LOL You will pardon me for likening his smug supercilious cocky style to that of a Jewtube agent troll.

Now he gets slimy:

“Why do the people promoting these hoaxes tend to engage in such open falsification of data, such as claiming that the concrete particles seen after the cop was shot were “smoke from a blank”*?  If this is real, why is there a need to be purposefully dishonest?”

No concrete particles were seen after the policeman was ‘shot’ only smoke from the blank and with an AK 47 there would have far more than just particles flying. The policeman was reported later to be seen alive a well. A Sky news reporter later at the scene of the ‘crime’ spoke of “blood having been put there afterwards”. I mean, come on, what is Anglin trying to defend here and is his Daily Stormer page just one big act of an agent provocateur to stir up trouble between whites and white religionists against Muslims, making him an agent for the Yids. If he is an agent for Mossad or the CIA then his game is now up, courtesy of yours truly.

If you read his page it’s amazing the lengths to which he goes in order to confuse and muddy the waters when the issue is clear that the Yids needed to keep up the villainous Muslim image at all cost. They are now getting a lot of heat in The USA, Britain and Europe re their crimes of genocide against the Palestinians. People, too, are getting wise to their ISIS tricks in Iraq and Syria so they needed a major distracting event to stir up Muslim hatred once more which Anglin at The Daily Stormer seems only too happy to supply.

He then condescendingly asks:

“Is the position of the conspiracy theorists that Moslems do not commit crimes or terrorist attacks at all, or just that they never commit big ones?”

Here he displays his ignorance or is he just mocking conspiracy people in a general sense? If so, then that should set alarm bells ringing for us who know there is a worldwide conspiracy (cons-Piracy).

So how does he display his ignorance? Quite simply by ignoring The Truth that Muslims have no need of violence in order to further their cause. Their religion is all they need to win people over due to the ineffectiveness of the Cainite-Judeo-Christian Religion in all its useless guises. The Cainite-Judeo-Christian Religion leaves and has left a massive vacuum and Islam is filling it. Perhaps that’s what pisses Anglin off and of course the mongrel dog Christian Religious scum and vermin that comment on his vile stinking page.

Finally he says this of the Yids:

“if they are willing and capable of staging massive hoaxes, why not blame nationalists, and turn people away from nationalism, rather than towards it?”

Well the simple answer to that is German Nationalists are beginning to rise up right now in rebellion against their Bolshevik Jew Marxist Merkel but at the same time against the wrong people i.e. The Muslims, due to hoax attacks like Paris. So you see, folks, it’s not complicated at all but, rather, very simple when you know how your pro Jew snake in the grass enemies think. Beware of the satanic disso Daily Stormer and its dumb ignorant duped followers.

For The Truth, that is, Real Christianity go here:

Posted in the daily stormer | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 29 Comments

The Latest Satanic Evil Offering From Aangirfan – “FREE WILL – DOING THE UNPREDICTABLE”

Now that’s a benign sounding headline, isn’t it? —– “Free Will – Doing The Unpredictable” (dated 3rd January 2015) Yes it is, until we start unravelling the evil Satanic inspired Bolshevik Jew Marxist diatribe that follows it.

However, before I start, I will make it crystal clear that man does NOT have free will, so this demonic creature Aangirfan is totally in error before he even starts, but then that should come as no surprise to you if you have been doing your homework regarding this Bolshevik Jew Marxist agent and disso illegitimate.

OK, first off, he cites a philosopher by the name of Daniel Dennet who allegedly says this:

“You can exercise free will by doing something unpredictable such as talking to someone you wouldn’t normally speak to in a supermarket queue. Or, deciding not to do something evil.”

But is that true? No way. You see, folks, man in his fallen condition (sinful state) resides beneath the limbs of the Tree of The Knowledge of Good and Evil and he can ‘choose’ to do good or he can ‘choose’ to do evil, but whichever he ‘chooses’ to do, he will still be an enslaved fallen man – a sinner – born into sin and a slave to sin and doomed to die.

A good analogy would be a prisoner serving a real life sentence. Now this prisoner could ‘choose’ to be a good prisoner, i.e. he is kind and gets on well with his fellow prisoners and causes no trouble for the prison staff or the governor or he could ‘choose’ to be an obnoxious, violent foul-mouthed trouble maker and spend much of his time in solitary confinement, but has either type of ‘chosen’ behaviour changed his prisoner status? NO, not at all, he is still a prisoner without his freedom serving a life sentence. So we can now see that the prisoner has a will, but it’s not free, it’s an imprisoned enslaved will and so it is with fallen and lost mankind.—Does-Mankind-Have-It?&id=443499

However, this is not all, because he then quotes more garbage from this Dennet creature:

“Imagine a fundamentalist Christian couple who decide to do something unpredictable – like accepting that God made some people gay, lesbian, bisexual and transgender.”

Here we can see the usual Bolshevik Marxist Jew liberal lies and anti-social responsibility cop outs. All sexual perversions are learned and then implemented and/or actioned by the pervert – period – no man is born a sodomite. Furthermore, the only god that can deceive us into being a sodomite/pederast, lesbian, bisexual and/or transgender is the god of this world, Satan the Devil.

Let’s be clear, if a child grows up with the right examples being set by the parents it will naturally follow those examples. If, however, the parents are loveless, graceless Bible thumpers then there is a good chance their children will rebel and become an embarrassment to the parents by going astray.

Then we get this load of  Jew propaganda tosh and nonsense:

“Imagine a person brought up as fan of Hitler deciding to accept that the Nazis are mainly criminals.”

Never mind that the term ‘Nazi’ was a Jewish term of insult to German National Socialists, who were far from being criminals, unless we’re going to accuse the majority of German people, at a national level, as criminals. All this, too, when all the time it was the Bolshevik Marxist Jews who were the criminals via their thieving bankster usury and unjust reparations demanded of post WW1 Germans.

Then the Aangirfan creature chirps in with:

“Philosopher Daniel Dennett says free will is much more complicated than many people believe.”

Well, as I have explained, free will is not complicated at all once you understand that you don’t have it – it’s an illusion – a myth, unless, of course, you’re a disso who quotes an error filled philosopher.

Next up we get this pure Jew propaganda:

“Think of the White racist who is not free to make friends with a Black neighbour.”

Notice it’s only the white racist, not a black racist or a yellow racist. Notice the satanic lie that a racist cannot be friends with those of another race. I am a racist, but would have no problem in a black or yellow entering my home or my country provided he or she didn’t take up residence. So what is this Aangirfan crap all about? Easy, it’s anti-white (real) racism and anti-white propaganda – genocidal hate speech against white people – that is what it is, so I hope you’re learning about this Aangirfan disso illegitimate and the moron he is quoting.

He then claims:

“You can avoid being manipulated.”

Really???? How does that work? If we’re manipulated from birth (which we are) how do we avoid being manipulated by people and their schemes we’re not even aware exist and are happening to us. You can only avoid being manipulated if you KNOW that you’re being manipulated – YES?? Or am I missing something? The amazing thing here is that this Dennet creature is a perfect example of an arrogant manipulated Bolshevik Jew Marxist atheist liberal zombie himself trying to correct or guide people who HE THINKS are being manipulated. LOL. Is this insanity at work here, or the wackiest form of surrealism I have ever encountered? Either/or, I reckon.

Then we get more self-righteous Bolshevik Marxist leftie arrogance:

Who are the people who are being manipulated and who are therefore not free? It is mainly the ultra-conservatives, the extremists and the fundamentalists.”

Ha ha ha ha, notice it’s not him that is the non-free extremist with his Bolshevik Jew Marxist atheist world view, oh no, it’s only ultra-conservatives and fundamentalists. And where do we find these ultra-conservatives, by which he really means fascists, today? Where are the sole dictators running their countries today apart from in Africa? Nowhere is the answer to that, so what is this devious snake dissembler on about? Again that’s easy, he’s propagandising and demonising The RIGHT and elevating the Bolshevik Jew Marxist world view as being the ONLY viable way. This is how these snake demonic bastards operate.

Here is his last mind numbingly ignorant statement whether knowingly or unknowingly:

“Think of the fundamentalist Communist who is not free to enjoy the benefits of moderate capitalism.”

He doesn’t even know that capitalism is now Bolshevik Marxist Jew usury fed Communist Corporatism and that all his ultra-conservatives are really Communist NeoCons.

To finish off he lists a list of 68 transgenders and exaggerates by claiming that the world is FULL of transgenders.

For The Truth, that is, Real Christianity go here:

Posted in aangirfan | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 12 Comments

WOW! Banned Again!!! Now Who is Patrick Henningsen with his 21st Century Wire Web Page?

Well that’s easy to answer – he’s just another disso and shill and very pally with some very suspect people, too, VERY SUSPECT PEOPLE INDEED!!!

Here are just some of the web pages linked from his ‘About’ web page:

The Guardian Newspaper no less and need I say more!!?? David Icke, Alex Jones (Infowars), RT (Rothschilds Today), Steve (son of CAIN) Quayle, Jeff Rense, and last, but by no means least, The UK Column!! Also listed are Activist Post, Alternate Current Radio, Before It’s News (who I know about), Global Research, Intellihub, Red Ice Radio, SGTreport and What Really Happened. These latter people apart from Before It’s News I know very little about, so anyone with any genuine info on these latter ‘AM outlets’ will be greatly appreciated.

OK, so what gives with these 21st Century Wire dissos? Well quite a bit as it happens, because there I was making one of my usual hard hitting comments on Before It’s News (BIN) when, out of the blue, I get a ban for what appears to be no real reason.  The reasons cited as it turns out were not applicable to my comment anyway and yet I was banned – so what’s going on???

I e-mailed BIN and they told me it was because I had posted links to my blog web pages in the comments section. Naughty, naughty, slap of wrist time, but wait, hang on a minute, I post those links in dozens and dozens and dozens of my comments on BIN, but no one complains or calls for a ban, so why should this particular thread be different?

Ah, the plot thickens, as they say, and it’s a Bolshevik Marxist Jew plot that thickens and we all know what they’re like, don’t we!!?? If you don’t, then it’s time you started some REAL TRUTHER research and gave up on all these ‘bottom of a cornflakes packet’ sources for your AM information.

So what is 21st Century Wire all about? Quite simply, and to put it politely, it is Sanitised Alternative News. What is Sanitised Alternative News I hear you ask? It’s watered down and disinfected alternative news and in the case of 21st Century Wire it is so watered down and disinfected it becomes tasteless and useless. It’s a bit like when an intellectual or a philosopher gets hold of The Holy Scriptures and makes them to none effect with their meaningless long winded babblings and blather.

I digress, here again from their ‘About’ page:

“21st Century Wire is News for the Waking Generation™. We are an independent media voice for geopolitical news and analysis, working with an array of contributors aggregating news and opinion from around the world.”

Here they claim that they are an aggregating news platform for a ‘waking generation’. That’s true, too, but to what end? Is it their aim to TRULY awaken people with The Truth or just feed them with their MSM styled spin, their version of the news, their pro-sodomite/pederast/lesbian/transgender, liberal, diversity laden, anti-white-Anglo-Saxon/Celt, multicultural, spin?

You see, folks, in order to be pally with The CIA Guardian there is no way you can be independent. In effect you’re compromised before you even put your fingers to the keyboard, because whatever you write has to be OK with The Guardian or it won’t get printed or even acknowledged. Believe it or not, but the same rule of thumb applies to the UK Column and that’s why 21st Century Wire gets plenty of air time on UK Column live stream broadcasts. Both these outlets are spewing forth the same useless sanitised and disinfected ‘we will not offend’ news.

However, a little about this BIN thread where a fella called Chris Everard, in association with 21st Century Wire, was bad mouthing The British Royal Family in true Bolshevik Marxist Jew fashion. Now don’t get me wrong because this modern Monarchy of ours are no angels and The Queen is most definitely guilty of treason over our membership of The Bolshevik Jew Marxist EU and for allowing Britian to be swamped with alien foreigners of all desciptions since the 1950’s and there are other alleged crimes in circulation on the web that she is being accused of, but until proven I will leave those out of this post.

No, what angered me in this Everard shill piece was the sheer ignorance re the genealogy of The Royal Family and the usual Bolshevik Marxist Jew anti-monarchy, anti-National Socialist propaganda running right through it. As soon as we get Nazis this and Nazis that we know we have Bolshevik Marxist Jew disinformation being spewed at us. This is why this piece found favour with Henningsen and when I posted my comment exposing their crap and a link to this page they threw a fizzie fit, like the big girl’s blouses that they are, and got me banned.

Here are one or three lies and blatant errors from this Everard disso crap:

1) “Her actual family come from Saxony and Bavaria – more of her ancestors are German than British.”

Queen Elizabeth II is a Royal Judahite (not Canaanite Jews) from Judah and is related to King David of Ancient Israel. The Judahites migrated across Europe with The Israelites and The Assyrians (The Germans) from the Middle East, but not all Judahites came to Britain. Some remained in Germany, France and Holland and that is why we find so called Germanic representation in the Royal Family but they are only German in name. The Hanoverians also were not Germanic with George I being a descendant of The Judahite Stuarts (Stewarts). So let’s be clear on this – THERE IS NO GERMAN BLOOD IN THE BRITISH ROYAL FAMILY – ONLY JUDAHITE ROYAL BLOOD.

2) “Her family’s financial affairs are forbidden from public discussion and she can recall and dissolve parliament whenever she likes.”

Her families financial affairs are forbidden from public discussion because they would disclose how much money is handed over annually to The Rothschilds and it is a blatant lie that she can dissolve parliament whenever she likes. Only Monarchs who rule totally by Divine Right can exercise that power and that power died with Charles I. QE II is a neutered Constitutional Monarch – a non-Monarch – a puppet. The last Monarch who tried to exercise power over Parliament was Edward VII and they very likely poisoned him as a result, just as they poisoned his father, Albert (Victoria’s husband), before him. Get it through your heads folks – The Bolshevik Marxist Jews HATE MONARCHY and anyone who jumps on that band wagon is siding with the Yids against their own Monarch.

3) “Taxes on Customs & Excise are collected worldwide and funneled into Buckingham Palace.”

This statement is another lie. All British taxes go straight to the IMF and/or The World Bank as does The Graduated Income Tax. British people see no benefits from taxation whatsoever.

Here’s another truth: back in the 1990’s the Royal Yacht Britannia needed a £52M refit and John Major the then Prime Minister refused to pay for it and The Royal Yacht was taken out of service.  Now if we have a multi-millionaire or a billionaire Queen why could she not scrape together a meagre 52 mil in order to refit a ship that she loved and openly wept over in public when it was decommissioned. Does this sound like a wealthy powerful Queen to you? Stop listening to the BS disso merchants and liars.

Let it sink in folks, The Czar and his family dying in a stinking filthy cellar like dogs was a Rothschild Bolshevik Marxist Jew warning to all remaining European Monarchies.

For The Truth, that is, Real Christianity go here:


Posted in 21st Century Wire | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 4 Comments

The Latest Cheap, Emotional, Manipulative Anti-White Propaganda Crap From Aangirfan

You can’t beat this Bolshevik Marxist Canaanite serpent creature, Aangirfan, for vile cheap shots at white people, can you? Sooner or later, between the odd tid bit pieces of Truth, you will soon get his ‘par for the course’ standard MO tirades of Bolshevik Marxist Jew propaganda spew and, with this, his latest snide post, we get two slimy evil pieces entitled: “Executed Kid Was Innocent” George Junius Stinney Jr. and then followed swiftly by “Trolls.”

Look folks, you better get wise to this illegitimate’s handiwork and quick because he’ll lead you down the garden path for sure and push you into his deep disinformation well with no way of climbing out, having addled your brain with his Marxist anti-white sound-bite repetitive disso confusion.

OK, so what’s it all about? Quite simply it’s cheap and underhanded manipulative emotionalism as used by the Jew controlled MSM (Mainstream Media) when they want to layer more guilt on white people for their ‘wicked evil past’. This is standard Bolshevik Marxist Jew MO to brow beat white people into thinking they OWE THE BLACKS. When nothing could be further from The Truth. If anything it’s the blacks that owe the whites and the Jews that owe the blacks. Whites owe blacks Zilch! Zero! Nothing!

You need to understand that The Jews controlled the BLACK African slave traders in Africa. The Jews owned many of the slave ships. The Jews ran the slave auctions in the plantations. The Jews owned the trading posts and supplied the plantations with all their provisions and equipment including the whips, collars, bracelets and ankle shackles. If you don’t believe me, then web search Professor Tony Martin, a black historian, and he’ll put you straight.

So what has this to do with the above titles? Everything, is the answer, because this lying dissembler and emotive manipulator Aangirfan has picked out a single case of false arrest and subsequent execution i.e. an alleged miscarriage of justice in order to lay guilt on white people.

Now if we compare this with black on black gun crime in the USA and, elsewhere, including ‘liberated’ South Africa what has this single case of alleged white injustice to do with anything other than promoting the anti-white Bolshevik Marxist Jew agenda of this low life scum Aangirfan?

In Palm Beach County in Florida, alone, about 88 out of every 100,000 young black men in the county were killed by blacks in homicides – 77 being the national figure. That figure is six times higher than it is for young white on white homicides. So with these statistics in mind, what has the rogue death of one 14 year old black child in 1944!!!!!! got to do with anything other than for emotive anti-white Bolshevik Marxist Jew reasons I have already given?

To finish this part I will draw your attention to the Rwandan Genocide where it is alleged that 800,000 black men, women and children were butchered with machetes and hatchets in a mindless satanic blood bath. Link here:

And this evil propagandist dross draws our attention to one black child killed by whites. Who remembers the Rwandans? Who observes any remembrance ceremony for these thousands? Does Aangirfan? Not likely, he’s too busy with his satanic Bolshevik Marxist Jew agenda.

Now with regard to his ‘Troll’ piece it seems that I am not alone in sussing this propaganda crap out. People are TRULY WAKING UP to the white genocide that is taking place before our very eyes and all ably assisted by treacherous scum like the BMJ Aangirfan.

The ‘Troll’ piece is the usual Bolshevik Marxist Jew atheist anti-Christian, anti-British, anti-white, anti-National Socialist propaganda. Here is the link:

I will leave you all to make up your own minds and let me know if you have any difficulty understanding what he is doing.

For The Truth, that is, Real Christianity go here:

Posted in aangirfan | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , | 3 Comments